Feed on
Posts
Comments



Personally when a really good movie comes out that I’m anticipating I try to immerse myself in the subject matter of the movie. It really helps give me a renewed sense of creativity and helps to form a more meaningful connection with the (impending) movie. In the case with Hellboy 2, I’ve gotten to speak with director Guillermo del Toro, Hellboy himself Ron Perlman, and the villain of Hellboy 2 (Prince Nuada) Luke Goss. Oh, and a little guy named Abe Sapien (Doug Jones). After speaking with them and re-reading as much of Mike Mignola’s original Hellboy material as possible I was fully prepared for the awesomeness that is The Golden Army.

Raise your hand if you were not aware that Jim Henson’s Muppets were actually just puppets with hands up their asses (I’m raising my hand). The suspension of disbelief is incredible when creature work and acting come together so well. Peanut butter and chocolate anyone? For anyone looking to immerse themselves in the Hellboy Narrative before seeing the movie (or before seeing it again, like me) be sure to check out our Hellboy Spectacular Episode of The Stack from this week, as well as our interview with Guillermo del Toro and the cast of Hellboy 2. Also here’s a couple of bonuses for those of you like me who love DVD extras:

Hellboy Spectacular edition of The Stack

Hellboy 2 Cast/Crew Interview edition of The Stack

Indy Mogul Forges “The Good Samaritan”

io9.com’s Hellboy reading essentials

Other Films by Guillermo del Toro:

Pan’s Labyrinth

The Devil’s Backbone

Cronos




Congratulations to Leah, the winner of our Persepolis Contest. Pulp Secret’s own Jeaux Janovsky has been hard at work assembling all the prize swag. Seriously, you wouldn’t believe the favors he had to perform to get some of this stuff…Recognize the NBot? You should, it’s an original piece of artwork by Jeaux. Thanks to everyone who participated. Remember you can’t win if you don’t play!

Pics: Leah’s hard-won Pulp Secret swag.


It dawned on me. Indy Mogul built a Hellboy Prop., Pulp Secret did an exclusive Hellboy 2 movie review. Why not mash-them both up in a blog post or two? Why didn’t I do this for the Hulk episodes (the Indy Mogul guys built a “pink” Hulk suit. At least now I’m fully aware and will mash just as well next week when the BFX crew do “something secret” associated with The Dark Knight movie.

Also, we purchased a block of tickets for the office to go see Batman in IMAX over at AMC in Lincoln Center. Monday the 21st at 2PM. Be there or be square. Of course there are a few nay sayers (Scott/Andres). But we’ve got a good crowd none-the-less. I’ll try and get as many good pictures of the fun before my camera gear is confiscated or smashed by the fake Hulk statue in the movie theater. I did an IMAX test run today after work. I went to see Kung Fu Panda in IMAX (at Lincoln Center). I have to say it was cool, but the theater doesn’t have too many seats, so I’m sure we’ll have to go well in advance. Our office is downtown on Park Avenue, so it’s clear across town. I smell a field trip! Unfortunately I was unable to attend the Indiana Jones special screening that the office did (for reasons beyond my control). That led to the “email list” crusade (also known as operation list join). You can guess the plot.

See you at The Dark Knight in a few weeks!



We’ve just posted photos from this week’s Comic Book Club. Our guest this week was the Son (or maybe Father) of Hulk, Greg Pak. Greg has worked on countless Hulk comics for the last several years. See if you’ve read any of them: Planet Hulk, World War Hulk, and now Skaar: Son of Hulk. Greg dished with Alex, Justin, and Pete on all things Skaar. He gave us a behind-the-scenes look at what is to come for our young Hulkling, and gave his thoughts on his other current title The Incredible Hercules. Greg even teased his upcoming project World War Hulk: What If. We had a great time, and should be posting some video of the evening shortly. Stay tuned, and in the meantime to whet your appetite for Hulk check out our Pulp Secret flickr account for all the great pictures.

Enjoy!

Pics: Greg with the guys, and dishing out some Hulk




I nabbed a few photos of the Hellboy gun aka The Good Samaritan that Erik has been working on for Back Yard Effects. Here’s the actual episode, it’s really good.

Pics: Dan and crew work on our super-secret new project in Frederator Studios, and everybody takes a turn playing with The Good Samaritan.

Since it’s Sunday and I have to turn in a bunch of course journals for my film theory class on Monday I’ll include on of them today, they’re dated based on the day of class they refer to:

6/09/2008
The books have finally arrived, so now journals and class discussions will include material from the text as well as class/film material we cover. Today’s topic is the coming of sound to motion pictures and the classical film narrative style.
By nature film is discontinuous. In contrast, music is continuous. Therefore using music in film helps to create continuity and help lead the viewer through the film. In 1927 Warner Brothers made The Jazz Singer (Crosland, 1927). This was the first major release of a motion picture with sound (called a talkie). Although only selected parts of the film included sound, this was a big risk to Warner Brothers as it was a brand new technology and not yet proven in mass markets. It was a success, and gradually other studios began releasing “talkies”.

By 1930 silent films only accounted for a fraction of new films being made (although they are still made, just in rare instances). Only a few artists held out like Charlie Chaplin, whose popularity and film styles were such that new technology was not necessarily an improvement for him. Eventually he did make a sound motion picture though (The Great Dictator, 1940).

Another example of artistic resistance to sound in motion pictures was Alfred Hitchcock. We screened a scene from his film The Lodger (1927). In the scene, Hitchcock used specially made ceilings to show ominous footsteps above a family eating dinner. It’s a good example of how good filming techniques can negate the need for sound (for instance, the sound of the footsteps on the floor above the family eating dinner). So the transition to sound films in Hollywood was not unanimous or immediate.

Like the rest eventually Hitchcock like Chaplin made the transition to sound motion pictures. Our film for today was Blackmail (Hitchcock, 1929), Hitchcock’s first sound film. In it Hitchcock uses something called contrapuntal sound, wherein the sound and image are made separately but go together. Also in the film Hitchcock uses the bird as symbol for loss of control and impeding chaos. Note that eventually he even made an entire film dealing with this symbolism called The Birds (1963) (which I screened in school when I was 13 consequently).

The text discusses some of the problems with early cinema. Most of the limitations were technical, but in Hitchcock’s case during Blackmail, his female star had a distinct accent (that was not a problem during silent films). He had to ask his star to lip-sync while another actress read the corresponding dialogue just off-screen. Other problems included poor recording quality microphones, necessitating that actors stand very close to recording devices (Dixon and Foster, 95).

Sergei Eisenstein, Vsevolod Pudovkin, an Grigori Alexandrov (all Soviet Montage filmmakers) wrote an essay on the use of sound in motion pictures (Statement on Sound, 1928). In it they talk about the potential problems and opportunities of using sound in films. They were worried that sound would increase the inertia of montage sequences (Soviet montage relied heavily on quick cuts between shots). If slowed down, montage sequences might not have the same meaning that directors intended. They did think that the contrapuntal use of sound vis-à-vis the visual fragmentation of montage would help the development of a more effective montage (Braudy and Cohen, 371).

In 1930s the Motion Picture Production Code was enforced more rigidly (it had been around since the 1920s). The leading figure in motion pictures censorship was Will H. Hays. This made crime stories, topical material, and sexuality very difficult to film. Studios began to tailor films to meet the moral limitations of the Hays Administration, whereas before studios did as they pleased.
Our other topic for the day was classical film style. There are a few characteristics of this style: Invisible editing, three point lighting, shallow focus, alternating dialogue, and centrality/frontality. The film we screened that depicted these characteristics (as well as sound in motion pictures) was Front Page (Milestone, 1931). An interesting fact is that Howard Hughes financed this film.

The film makes liberal use of dialogue, and while the story pace is slow, cuts between different character’s dialogue is quick.
Although the film wasn’t a class favorite and the sound transfer was bad, it was a very good example of an early sound motion picture and a film that made use of all the classical film style narrative techniques.“

Pics: Nope, check back tomorrow











Saturday was plenty of sleep, eating, and couch sawing. Yep, you heard me. Couch sawing. While our cousins are away my aunt and uncle are doing some much needed cleaning (our parents did the same thing when we used to go to camp). So we got the chance to watch a fed up uncle Scott buzz his way through their old downstairs couch. Where will Stewie hide out now? Unfortunately I neglected to take a picture of the front porch pile we created with the remains of said couch. After dinner the same fate befell the broken treadmill, may it rest in peace.

For dinner we went to a nearby sushi restaurant for massive consumption of sushi (of course). Lindsey pondered the fried ice cream, but a quick look from my brother (her better half) and some jokes from my uncle dissuaded her. I think I ate half our homemade cookies later that night. It was a lot of food.

Pics: Lindsey’s cookies, Stewie on the prowl (and by prowl I mean kitchen counter), and Tsuki Sushi.







Happy fourth of July everybody. Celebrate your country’s birth by blowing up a small piece of it (thank you, come again). I’m in Jersey with my brother and Lindsey for the weekend visiting our awesome aunt and uncle, who just finished their first kid-free week (yahoo for summer camp). We arrived early and had some great home cooking courtesy of Aunt Ali and Lindsey. They also started some cookies that took a few days to make (congratulate Lindsey on her dessert prowess).

Pics: Stewie tells me my bed is in the “other” room, Lindsey and Aunt Ali’s chocolate covered strawberries (in progress), Aunt Ali and Lindsey’s homemade dip, Porterhouse steaks…mmmmm, Roxie tests out the dirty dishes, Lindsey and Aunt Ali’s brownies, and their completed chocolate covered strawberries.

After a very brief celebration of the completion of summer school (and hopefully another good grade) I passed out into a food coma. I figured with a decent workout and a real reason to celebrate, why not. I probably should have had some beer. I’m not one to keep booze around for no reason. My brother likes to buy a tall can of cheap beer from the bodega down his street (a very unusual business, but not so much for Spanish Harlem). I’m sure Lindsey will have fun living in his neighborhood. While I was still living on his street they were doing non-stop construction. Plus I had full-time work and a full class schedule. Not exactly my idea of a relaxing introduction to the city, but it turned out pretty good.

Pics: The Frankenberry Figure that was the previous occupant of my desk. He didn’t give up his spot without a fight.

Last class today. We dealt exclusively with avant garde and extremely experimental filmmaking. This includes things like non-video and non-narrative cinema. In fact some of the films were so unique they are not available for viewing (even by us in class). We did have some luck watching clips in YouTube, and did get a good sense for most of the material.

Characteristics of these stories were that they didn’t tell stories at all. If they did tell a story, it was in an extremely unconventional manner. But, as Dr. Sterritt pointed out just because they’re called avant garde doesn’t mean they’re ahead of films made by mainstream filmmakers like Steven Spielberg.

We looked at the relationship between avant garde films and feature films and likened it to the relationship between poems and novels. Poems like avant garde films are very short and their form can vary greatly. They also don’t always tell a story.

Today we screened several short films including Un Chien andalou (Buñuel, 1929), Fireworks (Anger, 1947), and several films by Stan Brakhage (non-video films). Buñuel’s film was very surreal (it was co-written with surrealist artist Dali). The filmmakers later went back to edit the film so that no clear narrative or meaning could be drawn from the images. Like Brakhage they paid particular attention to dreams (Brakhage was also concerned with pre-dream vision and closed eye vision).

Throughout each screening we looked at P. Adams Sitney’s examination of avant garde films and his descriptions of film categories. He described films as either being trance films (psychodrama), lyrical films (evoking a child-like vision of the world and showing the adventure in seeing), found footage films (put together from previously unrelated footage and edited to create new meaning), and structural film (where the structure of a film is changed to change the meaning of the film).

Each film was very unique especially the example of structural film. We looked at copied frames of To Kill A Mockingbird (1962), that while hard to follow showed how altering the structure of a scene can alter our perceptions of relationships and characters. It’s too bad the class had to last for only 6 weeks. I’m sure we would have had a much greater chance to look at all the topics covered in much greater detail. It’s all been very cool.

Older Posts »